Vansant Swingers in Virginia

If you are looking for Swingers in Vansant, VA, then Swingular is the place for you. We have hundreds of thousands of swingers all over Vansant looking to meet new people. Here is a list of 16 random Swingers within 100 miles of Vansant, VA. To see more or to contact these members, click here to create a free account.

Vansant, Virginia Swingers can be found on Swingular. It's easy to find others using our advanced search technology. We base our search by zipcode so you will see how far each member is away from you by miles. You can search locally or you can search by state or zipcode as well. We have thousands of members from Vansant, Virginia so you have a very good chance that you will meet someone to your liking. We also have a booty call feature so you can post a booty call for quick response. Create your free account today and begin hooking up with Vansant Swingers right away!

Lets make today positive Hump day - - thanks all lol, ill run for swingers gov !! lol lol

Swingers In Uniform - Pay your memorial day respects here. - You might as well just drop off this site, DON_JUAN_QUIXOTE, who's going to want you now? It 'doesnt matter how attractive you are, or how intelligent you think you may be... when youre not a nice person, you're disgusting. Obviously you just joined the site to get your kicks out of browbeating people you feel are inferior to you. As my mother used to say... "If you cant say something nice, dont say anything at all." You, DON_JUAN_QUIXOTE, are an ass-tard!

Secret Swingers Club Ogden, UT - Clubs - Tonight’s password is for the ladies: “I’m just here to work on my dick-tionary and flick-opedias”. 😉

swingtown - a new show on cbs - I watched it and I loved it too. I have an issue with them showing swingers as predatory and also the widespread drug use. However, like others said, drug use like that was rather prevalent at the time. Oh well, I am a fan and plan on watching or recording it every week.

Vegas: Swingers circle or couples oasis? - Which do I prefer - Never been to swinger circle. We were told about couples oasis when we lived in Vegas by other locals. WD have been to the green door , red rooster and couples oasis. And out of all three couples oasis was the one I liked the best. It is the only one that does not allow single guys. Nothing against them but in that kind of setting they tend to give off that creepy feeling. Anyways it kinda like the manor there is a cover and it would is BYOB. There's a bar with a dance floor. Pool tables with a snack area. A group play area and some private play areas also a outdoor pool. During the summer I think they have pool parties on Sunday. Out of the 3 it is the only one I would go back to.

KUTV News Story on Swingers - News - [quote=CHEFFETTE][quote=FOXYUTAH]But why did they have to interview a FAT and bitter girl. If she was as hot and fun as most of the women are on here I'm sure she would've had more fun! LOL[/quote] Yeah, there's no such thing as a hot fat person, especially in the lifestyle! Oh, wait...there's hundreds, and they're having a blast w/ those people who don't care about body size or hotness, but about having fun and being satisfied.[/quote] I'm fat, but I am sexy as fuck and I know it! I am convinced her bad attitude (she didn't want to be there in the first place) is why she felt left out. News flash*** some people (like my husband) are not attracted to the girls who just go to the parties to get wasted. She would have been off his radar not because of her weight, but because she was getting drunk before playing. My hubby will not play with a woman who is not sober enough to consent to play (I'm sure it has something to do with his Southern Boy upbringing and the rules is our kink lifestyle--safe, sane, and consensual).

Orgy Party by Swingers Circle in Las Vegas - - Never been. Have been curious. The only reviews we've heard (admittedly very few) were negative. We're heard better things about Couples Oasis and the topless pool parties at The Artisan hotel on Saturdays. I think it's called evolve Beach Club. You can Google it.

Why so much hate in the swingers world... - - Bunny, just a couple of thoughts on this. First: When he picks a screen name that defines him as an object ( his dick) and not as a human, he has degraded himself in the eyes of many, especially those who seek to meet new people and make friends. It says that he in only interested in one thing, and that pigeonholes him from the beginning. Second: There are literally thousands of sites for singles only, obviously meaning that couples aren't allowed. Singles can be seen by some to be interlopers, predators, or worse. Third: Loathing or distain might be more accurate to describe the situation. Jumping on the use of hate sounds like self vicitimization. If he is so proud of what he is or has, don't play victim if someone doesn't automatically feel stimulated by him.

Breaking the 4th wall - meeting a swinger in a vanilla situation. - [quote=BLUEIDKAT] Basically my e-mail was: "Hi, I'm James, the male half of Blueidkat, I work as a sales rep for a national beverage company and consequently call on a lot of retail locations along the Wasatch Front. The other day I was at Blah business in Blah City and noticed someone who looks a lot like you. I know with all the swingers in Utah I must bump into some, everyday, and not realize it. It was so cool to possibly recognize a lifestyler out there in the vanilla world and just wondered if I was right." I understand the whole fear of being stalked and the need for anonimity but are we that afraid? Do we need to be?[/quote]Hey Blue, I know you guys didn't mean anything sinister! But yeah, that'd give me a bit of the creeps. If others read this, I'm sure they'll pipe in with some righteous opinions about how right you are and golly we all need to be proud of ourselves and such because of your statement/question, "I understand the whole fear of being stalked and the need for anonimity but are we that afraid? Do we need to be?" Hopefully few others will read this so we'll not start the whole "Having pics in the profile or not" argument again! :) To answer the question/statement you articulate above, yes, some folks do need anonymity. There are those folks that have a license for their job issued by County or State governments. Obtaining that license is considered a privilege, just like a drivers' license. No, the government can't search you or do medical tests on you against your will -- unless you want to drive. Then you acquiesce to their demands because you want that license. No, the government can't fire someone for perceived violation of a "morality clause" found in a licensing application. They can, however, deny or publicly harass a person about a license. Without that license many folks lose their job. Not good. So for some folks anonymity is not a matter of guilt or shame, but actually becomes a necessity to protect against a threat to their families livelihood. For me, I'm not paranoid or anything but I see absolutely no reason to expose myself unnecessarily. If someone I've met and actually KNOW approaches me away from the swinging scene, I'm totally fine with it, but an anonymous letter from someone I've never even met would bother me.

Are swingers moral? - Who determines what morals are? - [quote=SEAKINGHER]I was raised to believe that morality and the law are the same thing. People, in LDS society anyway, seem to profess that being moral is obeying the law and that is what they teach their children in church. I have always assumed that other religions do the same thing. But what seems to be said here is that swingers feel that the law has little or nothing to do with morality and that we are perfectly willing to break the law for our own pleasure. Is that what we are saying here.[/quote] Depends on what you are considering law. I think even in the LDS tradition there is an understand that God's law is higher than man's or governments law. A large part of the controversy of LDS polygamy comes because it was in disobedience to the law. Where church leaders believed that following their religious conviction was more important then what U.S. law said. But if you are taking some overarching moral law, like Kants categorical imperative then maybe. I think most swingers have the same ends in mind and no is being used as a means for an end. However that being said, I think most swingers seem to follow a more utilitarian guideline that pleasure is good and what promotes pleasure is good.