If you are looking
for Swingers in Matthews, GA, then Swingular is the place for you. We
have hundreds of thousands of swingers all over Matthews looking to meet new people.
Here is a list of 16 random Swingers within 100 miles of Matthews, GA. To
see more or to contact these members, click here to
create a free account.
Matthews, Georgia Swingers can be found on Swingular. It's easy to find others
using our advanced search technology. We base our search by zipcode so you will see how
far each member is away from you by miles. You can search locally or you can search by
state or zipcode as well. We have thousands of members from Matthews, Georgia so
you have a very good chance that you will meet someone to your liking. We also have a
booty call feature so you can post a booty call for quick response. Create your free
account today and begin hooking up with Matthews Swingers right away!
Swingers cars??? - What ya driving?? - [quote=TNT4FUN2]A Yugo and 74 AMC Pacer.[/quote]
Hey we got the same cars.
Are swingers moral? - Who determines what morals are? - I was raised to believe that morality and the law are the same thing. People, in LDS society anyway, seem to profess that being moral is obeying the law and that is what they teach their children in church. I have always assumed that other religions do the same thing. But what seems to be said here is that swingers feel that the law has little or nothing to do with morality and that we are perfectly willing to break the law for our own pleasure. Is that what we are saying here.
Tinder? Bumble? - What are your thoughts on tinder or bumble? Any luck meeting ls folk? - Any similar ones for swingers?
Why so much hate in the swingers world... - -
see we all get shit on here so don't feel like your the only one,,
kristy
STDs in the lifestyle - telling people they're no big deal - Hate to say it people, but if you are scared of STD's, this is probably the worst type of hobby, ativity you can have. Condoms or not the chance of contracting something still exists. Condoms break and the other juices flying around can circumvent a condom or other forms of protection. Especially HPV which is pretty common in sexually active people. It's not life-threatening but can be for women with the increased incidence of cervical cancer. It's like a lot of the other types of non life-threatening diseases, even if they aren't, who the hell wants to deal with something that you don't have to begin with? I mean even if there are treatments available, I'd rather not have to deal with something I contracted for the mere "Want" to fuck other people. See what I'm getting at? Like ThoughtGarden said, "abstinence" is the only way you can guarantee safety. So, again if you are worried, you might want to find another hobby, or just be extra safe and have a great time. It's what we've done and haven't had any problems so far. It's that one time though that could change a lot of peoples opinion on the lifestyle and safety. I do remember reading something that stated swingers for the most part are married, and believe it or not have an incredibly low rate of STD's because they keep the swinging on the inside with other safe, married couples. So, Single guys, sorry you are carriers of many bugs! LOL. Kidding. Screen them too and ask lots of questions. I think we can all have a great time. Find some great couples who you trust and swap until your hearts content.... That's all I got to say about that..
UtHot
Swingers In Uniform - Pay your memorial day respects here. - As a former Navy man i agree with Slowpez as well as Tequillarose and all other supportes. We should all be greatful to those who serve I do feel a bit sorry for misguided people such as Don Juan if he had an ounse of brain he would realize just how he got the freedom he has. It just isnt from our current military, firefighters or law enforcement it goes back hundreds of years when we broke away from England. Don do yourself and the rest of us a favor learn something about our great country before you knock it. This is something that takes some effort on your part and it will require removing your head from your ass, which seems to be where most of your comments come from
I wonder if swings servers were taken over? - Banks get cyber attacked last 2 weeks . - [align=center]I doubt the hackers were muslim terrorists.
And I doubt anybody was targeting swingers.
*shrugs*[/align]
Elusive FMF - Your thoughts? - Hello All!
Forgive the long post - but I simply wanted to respond to what VP stated SO well.
Posted by VP:
Here's a question:
Is it that a single swinging female is all that elusive, or is it just more likely that a woman who's secure enough in who she is to have a liberated lifestyle is probably more likely to have a boyfriend / husband? Thus making it a simple fact of life and society that the whole concept of a liberated single female is for the most part a myth or at best a temporary state.
Guys are programmed to be tomcats. There comes a time when "every boy must become a man". But little girls are taught that "sex is something only for your husband".
Society accepts single males prowling about generally - that's why when a single guy get shat upon in a swingers site, the resultant wailing bears striking resemblance to a chorus of whining mules. They don't get it: "They don't like me? Why? I'm hot..." Now if a woman were to go out there looking for it, then she's branded a home-wrecker, "slut", "whore", or worse. Tell me you'd sign up for that cruise?
IMHO: I think when a couple starts kvetching about the lack of single females, they might do well to have a look at why it is that they want just a woman and not her S/O. Chances are, deep down those same paradigms that are causing the lack of single females are deeply rooted in their own attitudes.
----------
From the "not so elusive" Te:
From my perspective I would have to agree with these statements wholeheartedly. I
swingin - thought this site was a swingers site -
WAAA1101 & CLASSYNOTTRASHY,
No one is telling you to leave. What we are saying is... If you don't like the subject of the thread, move on. You are claiming that it is impossible for you to accomplish this. Classy, you used the word "Forum Police". Remember, WAAA1101 is the one who started this thread trying to get everyone to stop posting threads that didn't have to do with sex. That is textbook "policing". Furthermore Classy, you, like WAAA, make it your regular business to complain about others and what they choose to converse about. I think things would get better if you quit complaining about threads you don't like and involve yourself in the ones you do. You are the ones being intolerant of us. We have heard that you are "unhappy" with the thread and why. To me, your unhappiness seems to stem from your inability to control what people talk about here.
WAAA1101, you tell me if I don't like explicit photos to, "get over it". I do "get over it", by not going to the theads that contain them or starting them myself. I think you need to "get over" our threads. You need to practice what you preach. Live and let live. So far it is people like you and Classy that are breaking the forum policy, by trying to stifle free speech. You two are the ones that are trying to get others to stop talking. We are not going to stop talking about what we want, because you don't like it. The majority has spoken, we want to talk about anything we choose. You can't justify your intolerance.
-Don-
"Ich habe einen kleinen Vogel in meinem Kopf."
Note: Best if viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer version 7BOOTY CALL - - Yeah, I put that request in on the "improvements" section of the forum YEARS ago! Amen to that! All these horny UT swingers sitting at home with nobody to do...what a shame.
|
