If you are looking
for Swingers in Monroe, OK, then Swingular is the place for you. We
have hundreds of thousands of swingers all over Monroe looking to meet new people.
Here is a list of 16 random Swingers within 100 miles of Monroe, OK. To
see more or to contact these members, click here to
create a free account.
Monroe, Oklahoma Swingers can be found on Swingular. It's easy to find others
using our advanced search technology. We base our search by zipcode so you will see how
far each member is away from you by miles. You can search locally or you can search by
state or zipcode as well. We have thousands of members from Monroe, Oklahoma so
you have a very good chance that you will meet someone to your liking. We also have a
booty call feature so you can post a booty call for quick response. Create your free
account today and begin hooking up with Monroe Swingers right away!
Other activities? - Do you only meet swingers for sex? - we are going to make two posts. This one (the humor) and a more serious one. The second will take a bit of writing...
Meet em at the party
Have sex with them
find out names
go to dinner
decide it you like them
have a nice after dinner conversation
MEANT COMPLETELY as humor
Swinging signs at the gym - Swinging syns at the gym - Are there any Utah specific things we can wear at the gym to let others know we’re swingers?
Swingers Next Door! - ABC news story on Swinging! - Haven't seen the show but read the article. The comments at the end were worth the read alone. Thanks for sharing.
Swingers in Draper cause Super Dell to speed - - LOL - Good One!
That explains everything!
We knew that there was a reason he was driving like such a maniac!
Very Funny
Thanks for the laugh!
Where do we get those concealed swinger permits?
And we are still trying to find the recuiting office!
lol
;)
kisses
Why so much hate in the swingers world... - - ok now im thinking of Don with a bottle..... LOL bend over hun take it like a man....
Swingers - a couples only lifestyle? - Are singles considered to be swingers? - The above comments are very interesting, and do promote thinking about how it all began.
I grew up during the time when 'swapping' was just starting to catch hold. Swappers were married couples, and they did indeed swap partners. Single people were called 'swingers' at that time as they had many partners for sex. Basically singles did not have a steady relationhship with just one partner. An unmarried couple could be swingers, as they could go their separate ways at any time. A married couple did not easily have the option to go separate ways, so they remain swappers unless they got a divorce. Keep in mind that the two terms applied only to those that actively sought out new sex partners, and did not apply to the population in general.
Over time, perhaps about 1965-1969, the word 'swapper' became a bit derogatory, so the married ones adopted the word 'swinger' as it seemed to be more lively and exciting sounding. Thus they moved into word usage territory of the singles. Today both singles and couples share the word.
The meaning of words and their application change over time in the America language. As an example, the word 'Queer' changed to 'Fag' and later to 'Gay'. It took from about 1940 until about 1988 for the word 'queer' to evolve into 'gay'. It's still the same people, just a different word has been adopted that sounds more happy and exciting.
To say a single man looking to get laid is not a swinger, but a single lady looking to get laid is a swinger is totally wrong. Both are either horney, or both are swingers. There can be no distinction between the two.
So, where does that leave us? Today both singles and married couples share the word equally. That is, unless the American language is evolving again. Perhaps the word 'Humming Bird' (going from flower to flower for nectar) will become the singles new description.
Translating Personals/Swingers Ads - - that was so funny . now i need to go back and change all my profiles . ha ha ha ha
naughty dreams
freaky kitty
Mormons - - PICTUREDICK,
Before you do what a lot of individuals do on this site and make presumptuous comments, get to know the history of the website a little. The site was called something else when it started in FL. Rob, the founder of "Swingular" seperated from the co-founder of the original site. He moved to Utah and began marketing it here. That is why it is more prevelant in the two states. Polygamy in the local history has nothing to do with the amount of swingers on this site. It has everything to do with localized marketing efforts. The only people involved in polygamy in Utah are now mainly extreme minority offshoots of the LDS religion, like the FLDS or "Fundementalist Latter Day Saints" Church. They are shunned by the mainstream LDS church. They are the very reason many people today, still attach the word "polygamy" with mormons. I too, once presumed such things about them. After living amongst the mainstream members, I was quickly educated. I wasn't slamming you, it's just that we have a lot of individuals here that would rather presume or assume than take the time to research. It's kinda like people thinking most Texans are ignorant racist rednecks. While there will always be those that are true to the stereotype, it hardly means we should make such presumptions about the majority, when visiting. Hell they still hold KKK rallies in the south. There are lots of pitchforks and torches on swingular LOL!
-Don-
Friend collectors or swingers - - We are real and always meeting and playing with new people
Why so much hate in the swingers world... - - Posted By: TEQUILAROSE Reply posted on:
Jan 8, 2008 - 1:02 pm
AKLIM,
Saying pitbulls are a dangerous breed would be as inaccurate as saying all mexicans are illegal and are on welfare, all blacks like fried chicken and listen to rap music or all whites live in a trailer park and fuck their sister.
There are dangerous Pitbulls, just as there are dangerous German Shepards and Golden Retrievers. It does not make it right to assume all are just because some are. Pitbulls are not the "most dangerous" breed by nature. The have a higher risk of attack, because many people mistreat them because of how they fight. Mis/Disinformation, ignorance and insecurity is what perpetuates intolerance
Again, you are right. However, there are those that will cite raw statistics to JUSTIFY their opinion instead of trying to FORM an opinion.
|
