wrote:
Evening swingers.
The new site location is: http://www.ntaktagf.info
We have busy jobs like the rest of you, so we are sorry that the site is moving slowly. We have to be a bit careful with the login sign for obvious reasons. We don't know a thing about web design and we aren't really that interested in learning either LOL! But, we know we are stuck with it for now.
Swingular has run amuck and is effectively being controlled from the inside by a few select members. Be careful out there. Legal counsel IS monitoring the forums. Computer security is POOR at best. The more venomous Forum posters are trying to Google, search, find, or create any dirt they can to muddy the water here. We've taken a pretty good bashing, but we're OK so far.
It looks like TR and his "Free Thinkers" have really roughed up some swingers on this site. Since we've opened up for donations to help pay the bills for this cause, we have received $1,340 in cash in envelopes sent to the POB. Not a single one of these letters has a return address, which is smart. If you know who goes down, he will fight dirty. Do not leave any sensitive information out there in your accounts. We are positive that certain members at Swingular have cracked other members passwords (including ours).
1. Change your password to at least ten characters, including special characters. Currently free software on the internet can crack a 8 character password in 60 minutes. Adding 2 or more characters makes cracking much more difficult.
2. If Swingular is hosting your personal web page
Speaking of beds... - A question for our friends - The wife and I have a question to post - wherein we ask this: What bed is the best possible match for a pair of swingers that love to play?
This question comes about due to the recent demise of our bed. It appears that 2 years of AMAZING sex WILL destroy a low-quality mattress.
The most frustrating part of the low-end mattress is the fact that even when it's just the Mrs. and I, there is entirely too much noise from the box spring set and mattress together to enjoy a hard ride without fear of the kids hearing and being mortified.
Recommendations for soft, silent, and amazingly comfortable mattress sets will be greatly appreciated.
-Scotch (& Kitten)
More members out east!!! - - We do tell as many fellow swingers as we can obout swingular.. As for admin... They did contact us and we are very happy with their responce... Just goes to show you they are good peeps... We will be working "hard" to boost the east coast membership....
Swingers In Uniform - Pay your memorial day respects here. - As a former Navy man i agree with Slowpez as well as Tequillarose and all other supportes. We should all be greatful to those who serve I do feel a bit sorry for misguided people such as Don Juan if he had an ounse of brain he would realize just how he got the freedom he has. It just isnt from our current military, firefighters or law enforcement it goes back hundreds of years when we broke away from England. Don do yourself and the rest of us a favor learn something about our great country before you knock it. This is something that takes some effort on your part and it will require removing your head from your ass, which seems to be where most of your comments come from
That little nudge many of us need - - We think honesty is the best way to be. If she found out about the meeting without her knowledge, your tryst into the lifestyle may be over. Plus, she might feel the pressure to play at some point anyway. Also, she will always wonder if the next meeting is arranged without her knowledge.
Evildoers is correct in meeting with zero chance of playtime. Take their advice. She will feel more relaxed and could enjoy herself with the pressure off. We will take it a step further:
Step 1: Set up a date with ZERO playtime opportunity and let the other couple know that. Do something fun (a hike, Topgolf, etc) and get to know them. At the conclusion of the date, let them know that if they do not receive a message from YOU within 24 hours, you don't feel you are a match.
Step 2: If you send a message to meet again, let them know your intent and your boundaries. For example, (kissing ok), (fondling ok), (bi kissing ok), (same room, separate room, either room ok), (nudity ok or not). But, speak honestly with each other about this. It's not nice to lead people on after you have committed. At the conclusion of the date, let them know that if they do not receive a message from YOU within 24 hours, you are not ready to go further.
Step 3: If you send a message to meet again, let them know what is acceptable. For example (full swap or soft swap), (same room, separate rooms or either ok), (kissing or no kissing), (bi play) etc. Again, you will have to be honest with yourselves if you can do this. By a third date, the other couple has invested a lot of time in you. So, be nice and don't lead them on. Enjoy the playtime. Save enough time for the afterglow sex with them relaxing, chatting, and laughing.
By this point, you may have found a couple that you can see multiple times. Doing vanilla activities with them might be a bonus. They may even introduce you to their lifestyle friends too.
The other option is attending a house party where play is not expected. You will be able to speak to several couple and perhaps, use the process above. Or you can play that night.
When we entered the lifestyle, we never had that couple who could mentor us. After we considered ourselves as no longer newbies, we became the newbie "whisperers" to offer what we never had. However, we've gotten away from newbies since our circle is with experienced swingers now. But with covid, we would date newbies again.
"Swinger Robots"?? - WtF?, Now, on top of everything else, we have to worry about Robot Swingers? - [quote=SHENANIGANIZER]Tmaca, love the quote![/quote]
D'ya grok who said it?
Reject Affair Match - Cheaters are not swingers - My personal opinion, a cheater isn't going to stop "trolling" on here just because there is a "special" site for them .
A cheater is a cheater and will do what they need to to cheat.
I don't personally condone giving them help to cheat. Even if its only directing them to a cheating website.
Mrs Fun
Just curious are we the only ones? - Just curious are we the only ones? - [quote=BMSHELL]
Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that there are 3,000 couples in Utah who are actively interested in swinging. (Again, I have SERIOUS doubts that the number is that high, based on data I've collected from Swingular... but let's roll with it)... There are 886,000 couples in Utah, which means there's a 0.33% chance (1 in 300) that the couple you're looking at are swingers.
However, if the number of ACTIVE swinging couples in Utah is closer to 1,000 (far more likely), the odds go down to 0.11% (1 in 1,000). This is probably a more realistic picture of your odds when you try to pick up a random couple in the wild.
[/quote]
A caveat of this analysis is that it assumes a uniform distribution of swingers over the population of Utah. My guess is that this isn't the case but instead the density of swingers aligns with the density of more liberal thinkers. The net result is that it would put more swingers in the more densely populated areas with the highest density in SLC. That could easily swing the odds from 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 100. At least for those of us in SLC. For the poor suckers not SLC it could go the other way. :) That said, yes, I feel lucky enough to gamble basically nothing on 1 in 1,000 odds. ;)
KUTV News Story on Swingers - News - [quote=CHEFFETTE]
There's little journalism here in Utah; it's about driving views whose numbers can be used for ad revenue. Titillation drives views. The curiosity gap ("You won't believe what happens next!") drives views. Informing is never considered necessary, only attracting views and/or clicks.
There are hungry children in every county of this state but a salacious and sexxxay story is what they choose to put on the news? Useless entertainment masquerading as a higher purpose.[/quote]
Thank you for using the word "Titillation"
To add to my comment, Heidi, please only friend us if you paid for a membership, that would be true journalism, doing anything you can for a story. Also, I agree with Cheffette, please feed the children next. A middle class family with kids walking in on the nasty is wrong, but more wrong is starving children that don't have a meal for tomorrow. We as 'Merican's focus on what "titillates" us and we forget what is wrong with our cuntry. We focus on starving children in Africa, but not here at home. Let's focus on US for a change.
