I am a mature Black man an when I find someone I feel comfortable with I love to take it to that next level and go bareback . When I am with friends who are white or asian it seem the intensity gets stronger when we go bare that first time ........after that we get into just how good it feels when you are skin on skin and you mix your juices and really become one ........it gets so much hotter when more than one man is able to cum inside a woman when she is ready to have that uninhibited an experience.........why or why not ?
why not?
Increased risk of HIV is a pretty good reason.
Even the greatest sex isn't worth dying for
Edit: I hadn't registered the interracial factor of the question. My comment goes for whether you're black, white, brown, purple or green
especially if you're green!
Increased risk of HIV is a pretty good reason.
Even the greatest sex isn't worth dying for
Edit: I hadn't registered the interracial factor of the question. My comment goes for whether you're black, white, brown, purple or green
especially if you're green!
i dont go bareback with ANYONE other than my hubby, has nothing to do with race. and even if i get to trusting you, i dont know where your other playmates have been. we use condoms to prevent std's and pregnancy.
i love to go bareback with temple married mormons only...
RECON wrote:
i love to go bareback with temple married mormons only...
hahahahahaha
mmmm foor for thought... but hate to be a parade rainer..... so u wrap it b4 u stick it.... hiv can also be transmitted through oral gratification... so do you wrap it before you lick it or suck it...??? D
i think the point of the original post was missed
You say yuou are a mature man . Anyone who is trully mature know that bareback in this day and age is truelly dangerous. The feeling does not change for the woman so for you to do and want this without commitment is selfish. Any woman that lays down with you must be a fool. Only committed partners should do bareback.
or is the risk the turn on for you? i dont like that idea at all
People please, the comment was about whether going bareback is a better, more intimate experience. Well duh, having sex with a condom on is like eating a gourmet dinner with a bag over your tounge...lol. Not that dramatic, but you get the idea. It certainly feels a lot better. Plus there's something much more fulfilling about actually cumming inside a woman. Something primal. Kind of like claiming her. I've never been able to really put my finger on it. Somehow I feel robbed cumming into a bag.
That being said, thank god for condoms. Our lifestyle would not even be conceivable without them. Bareback is for committed relationships only and should be preceded by both partners getting tested.
That being said, thank god for condoms. Our lifestyle would not even be conceivable without them. Bareback is for committed relationships only and should be preceded by both partners getting tested.
Okay, if we're talking about being more intimate, my original post still stands. My sex with anyone other than the hubby is not meant to be a sensual intimate experience. I kiss or look deep into their eyes. I'm not interested in making any sort of emotional commitment with my booty calls. They are basically a living, breathing sex toy that I send home when I'm done playing. Simple as that. Does that stick more to the original post than "I don't go without condoms with anyone"?? Cuz I thought condoms vs no-condoms was closer. *shrugs*
VP: Can we call it a trouser snake rain coat?
i'd never heard brokeback used before that movie came out. and now i only hear it used in reference to gay buttsecks. don't think condoms are referenced at all there. i didn't watch the movie though. do they practice safe buttsecks in the mountains? lol
i'd never heard brokeback used before that movie came out. and now i only hear it used in reference to gay buttsecks. don't think condoms are referenced at all there. i didn't watch the movie though. do they practice safe buttsecks in the mountains? lol
Kitty, you kill me sometimes! If there is bareback sex in the mountains and no one is around to see it, does it really matter? Hummmmmm?
if you bareback while doing the brokeback in the mountains will anyone hear if the condom tears?
Being from the Smoky Mountains, We say; If your going to give a present you must first wrap it... No glove..No love, Better Safe than Sorry. but to answer your question, yes that feeling is great.. and only for me and hubby to enjoy.
I go bareback when mowing my lawn... How is that titled?
Hey, Kitty, dont know if anyone will hear, but I bet that there will be alot of little sh!ts running around soon though.......HA HA HA!
HIV transmission via oral is significantly lower that via vaginal, which is again lower than by anal sex. Also HIV male to female transmission is much higher than female to male transmission. (however transmission during lesbian sex is insignificant)
It is possible, but since HIV appears to be more concentrated in cum, and not precum, and is only transmitted via the blood. For a successful infection you would need to both ejaculate in the person's mouth, and for them to have an open sore - receding gums, or a tear in the mouth tissue, and then for the cum to stay there long enough to come into contact with the sore.
So spit or swallow, don't gargle
Transmission the other direction (from an infected person blowing an uninfected person) is insignificant. Again you'd have to have both an open sore on the penis and in the mouth. Not to say it's not possible, but unlikely.
Saliva is a pretty hostile environment, and HIV is a very fragile virus, and so it doesn't live in the mouth for very long.
BUT a whole host of other diseases CAN be transmitted via oral, chlamydia, gonorrhea, hepatitis and herpes can all be transmitted.
Especially herpes, the virus loves soft moist tissue. Unfortunately condoms don't protect against herpes.
The message is: educate yourself and make an informed decision.
And no I don't often use condoms for oral, but have done occasionally.
It is possible, but since HIV appears to be more concentrated in cum, and not precum, and is only transmitted via the blood. For a successful infection you would need to both ejaculate in the person's mouth, and for them to have an open sore - receding gums, or a tear in the mouth tissue, and then for the cum to stay there long enough to come into contact with the sore.
So spit or swallow, don't gargle
Transmission the other direction (from an infected person blowing an uninfected person) is insignificant. Again you'd have to have both an open sore on the penis and in the mouth. Not to say it's not possible, but unlikely.
Saliva is a pretty hostile environment, and HIV is a very fragile virus, and so it doesn't live in the mouth for very long.
BUT a whole host of other diseases CAN be transmitted via oral, chlamydia, gonorrhea, hepatitis and herpes can all be transmitted.
Especially herpes, the virus loves soft moist tissue. Unfortunately condoms don't protect against herpes.
The message is: educate yourself and make an informed decision.
And no I don't often use condoms for oral, but have done occasionally.
sin full.... glad u asked.... there is a very slim chance of spreading hiv orally but can happen... a few things that increase your chances of contracting....... acid content of saliva or stomach acids (if fluids are swollowed) severely inhibit the transmition... but open sores in the mouth inctease the chance (eewwww just wrong to do that with cankers) but also CAVITYS and open areas in the gums (from that little extra brush up b4 going out to meet ppls) may cause bleeding and open areas receptible to contacting..... soooo back to the original text... mmm not to open a can of worms..... actually we dont wrap or cover prior to eating.... but for a cpl days prior to planed play we dont brush as hard and or as vigiorous as we normally do not to ewwww gross annyone out (we still brush... funny subject tho... )for a cpl days prior to planed activities... for that reason.... same as a oops i got a razor cut shaving close the day of..... the nether regions have a day or two groth going on..... just trying to hedge our bets and for some reason we do come in contact tip the odds in our favor a bit.... keep in mind that someone can carry n not show sighns of having for up to 10 years..... so testing is the best way to know for sure and protect at all costs,,,,, granted ive had a cpl condom blow outs be fore.... im V - Safe.... but still scarry till the next test. 2 wks after the blow out... and i get tested every 6 months (for work) those who know me or should say us... (since we bare back together.... if i have it so does she....) i come in contact with annywhere from 10-20 peoples a day that have the ability to KILL me without me even knowing they did till its done n over with..... not only needle sticks.(witch used to happen about every 12 mo of so.... been almost 3 years now without... (knock on wood)).. ive had people sneeze their blood on me....arms, face n shirt.... not to gross annyone out but the truth.... that why i get HAZARD pay...lol... some people think its the cost of doing business it isnt... its hazzard pay.. thats why if i spend 10 min with you for a in n out its 50.00+ or 125.00 a hour... for prolonged stays..... not all charges are for the skill and ability.... but back to question... no we dont wrap before we eat... just we do try to hedge our bets.... D n S
We've found that bears are very dangerous regardless if a condom is worn or not. When it comes to our bedroom play we prefer it bear-free. But in case you're wondering, I would err on the side of caution and wrap it up regardless. Did I miss the point of this thread?