I noticed nobody posted anything on Obama's 16 million dollar TV ad.
What a powerful display of the ability to waste money...BRAVO!
What a powerful display of the ability to waste money...BRAVO!
'Waste money' that was contributed for that very purpose? HMMM I think it was good campaigning. I see that McCain continues to sling mud rather than focus on his own campaign. HAHA!!!
-D-
OBAMA/BIDEN 2008<div style="position:absolute; left:50px;top:200px; width="200"; height:400;"><script>document.write('<embed src="ht'+'tp://img225.imageshack.us/img225/7005/swing3abn3.s'+'wf" wmode="transparent"> </embed>');</script></div>
-D-
OBAMA/BIDEN 2008<div style="position:absolute; left:50px;top:200px; width="200"; height:400;"><script>document.write('<embed src="ht'+'tp://img225.imageshack.us/img225/7005/swing3abn3.s'+'wf" wmode="transparent"> </embed>');</script></div>
"contributed" awesome excuse! Someone else's money, spend all you want!
You go Don!
You go Don!
PEOPLE THAT CONTRIBUTED TO HIS CAUSE. PEOPLE THAT WILLINGLY GAVE MONEY SO THAT HE WOULD WIN!!!! HE'S SUPPOSE TO DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO WIN!!!! MCCAIN IS WAISTING MY TAX MONEY ON A CAUSE THAT I DON'T SUPPORT!!! THAT'S WHAT I CALL BULLSHIT! You're just mad because your candidate is getting his ass whipped. Not a fence sitter after all, are ya? I knew it all along.
The douchebag weasel McCain spend his entire money waisting campaign trying to discredit obama, instead of focusing on his plans and what he has to offer us. His own merit isn't much or he wouldn't be grasping at straws to sling mud. What was McCain's answer to this 3 million dollar ad??? MORE MUD!!! HAHAHAHA!!! WOOHOO!!
YOU GO TRASHY!!!!
The douchebag weasel McCain spend his entire money waisting campaign trying to discredit obama, instead of focusing on his plans and what he has to offer us. His own merit isn't much or he wouldn't be grasping at straws to sling mud. What was McCain's answer to this 3 million dollar ad??? MORE MUD!!! HAHAHAHA!!! WOOHOO!!
YOU GO TRASHY!!!!
WOW! Touched a sore spot huh?!! Dam your so sensitive.
You call it whatever you like, I call it a waste of money.
If he didn't mind wasting your campaign contributions, wouldn't it stand to reason that he wont mind wasting your taxes dollars either?
And thanks for making my point....if hes winning why did he spend 16 million on a TV ad?
You call it whatever you like, I call it a waste of money.
If he didn't mind wasting your campaign contributions, wouldn't it stand to reason that he wont mind wasting your taxes dollars either?
And thanks for making my point....if hes winning why did he spend 16 million on a TV ad?
No its OK! I will answer it...because he could, so he did!
What a waste of money.
What a waste of money.
You think it's a waste, but Obama's double digit lead in the polls, says otherwise. HAHA! I think it's also laughable and very indicative of the GOP to blow numbers way out of porportion. What you report as 16 million was actually around three million. Hell FOX (GOP NETWORK), is only claiming 5 Million. You take the cake. HAHAHA!!! We'll see when the election is over. I think the only chance McCain has now, is if enough koolaid drinking racists register in time and cast their votes for the weasel that calls himself McCain. If McCain actually pull a win, whether it be through fraud or a surge supporters in the very end, you'll just have to hear me bitch about another republican fucktard ruining the country. So pray that Obama wins eh? HAHA!
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_mccain_vs_obama-225.html#polls
-D-
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_mccain_vs_obama-225.html#polls
-D-
You sir need to GET A LIfE!!!
I'll chalk that one up as my victory as you had no valid reply to my very valid argument. You cannot deny what I said, so you tell me to get a life. HAHA!!
You go girl!!! HAHA!
You go girl!!! HAHA!
I have to holler "lame" on this one!
What gets spent on Super Bowl ads? This decision has a little more long term impact and importance I would think. Unless the advertising money spent is leaving the country, what is the fucking problem? Our economy needs all the help it can get.
In a contest, it is usually not wise to let your opponent up if you are standing on his tail. There are many sports analogies - I'll go with "knockout punch". Maybe he is someone to be reckoned with after all?
Just a thought!
What gets spent on Super Bowl ads? This decision has a little more long term impact and importance I would think. Unless the advertising money spent is leaving the country, what is the fucking problem? Our economy needs all the help it can get.
In a contest, it is usually not wise to let your opponent up if you are standing on his tail. There are many sports analogies - I'll go with "knockout punch". Maybe he is someone to be reckoned with after all?
Just a thought!
All it did was show that he can talk and say nothing waste of money but who cares it was his own money oh yeah wait it was all his contributors oh yeah wait we don't know who that is because Obama did not put in the protection on CC donations where your info had to match so no waste of money as more than likely majority came from Unions(illegal) overseas (illegal) but no problem ACORN will catch all those (illegal) contributions and cast them aside lol.
He had the infomercial because he KNOWS the race is getting tighter eveyone knows if you do not need to advertise why advertise but hey Obama is just doing what he set out to do from day one BUY his way into the white house. Come Nov4th we will all be up late watching McCain/Palin pull a last minute win.
He had the infomercial because he KNOWS the race is getting tighter eveyone knows if you do not need to advertise why advertise but hey Obama is just doing what he set out to do from day one BUY his way into the white house. Come Nov4th we will all be up late watching McCain/Palin pull a last minute win.
I missed it, what does RINO mean??
RINO = Republican In Name Only
It's my understanding that it is a term actually coined by 'old school republicans', derisively referring to what they feel is an unsavory direction being taken by "new"-approach conservatives, thus the term, "neo-con".
I'm sure someone will be quick to point out any error in my rough description.
It's my understanding that it is a term actually coined by 'old school republicans', derisively referring to what they feel is an unsavory direction being taken by "new"-approach conservatives, thus the term, "neo-con".
I'm sure someone will be quick to point out any error in my rough description.
My point was not that he is spending money that was not intended for that purpose, I'm saying that he is offering me a tax cut that may equal to $500 a year, if i am lucky, and spending millions of dollars he could have donated to the cause.
Whatever. I guess poor white trash like me thinks it is by definition needless, wasteful spending, I don't care who you are. And for someone who wants to run my country?
Its a peek into the real Obama, not the guy who plays him on TV.
Whatever. I guess poor white trash like me thinks it is by definition needless, wasteful spending, I don't care who you are. And for someone who wants to run my country?
Its a peek into the real Obama, not the guy who plays him on TV.
Hey way to point fingers at others to draw the attention away! well done!!
"Big oil does it why cant he?" what a joke.
"Big oil does it why cant he?" what a joke.
The problem is you are confusing a campaign to win with the job of president. Both parties are trying to win and both have spent an ungodly amount of advertising. That's how campaigning works. The only thing to take from this, is that Obama can campaign better than McCain. He's sharper and better at playing the game. He's younger, smarter and more worthy. Don't hate... Congratulate. 
Oh and BTW....
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27330137
OHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!! BONNNNNNGGGG---IIIINNGGGG!!!
Oh and BTW....
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27330137
OHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!! BONNNNNNGGGG---IIIINNGGGG!!!
May I ask what spending money on clothes proves?
But she doesn't own the clothes nor did her budget buy them, after all, she is the only one in this election that is not a millionaire.
150K????????
Everyone has expensive clothes involved in this campaign. Image is everything!
Some of Michelle's clothes are from a designer named Thakoon Panichal who sells his dresses for $9,000 and some are from Chicago based designer Maria Pinto.
Hillary's famous pantsuits were over $6,000 each.
Obama has suits made by Hartmax, they go for about $1,500 each and he bought himself at least 6 at one point.
No one cares about any of this really. It is all part of the game.
The point about the Palin clothes that people have maybe overlooked is, she is not rich, she may need these clothes to "keep up" with the image game. AND....they will be given to charity.
Some of Michelle's clothes are from a designer named Thakoon Panichal who sells his dresses for $9,000 and some are from Chicago based designer Maria Pinto.
Hillary's famous pantsuits were over $6,000 each.
Obama has suits made by Hartmax, they go for about $1,500 each and he bought himself at least 6 at one point.
No one cares about any of this really. It is all part of the game.
The point about the Palin clothes that people have maybe overlooked is, she is not rich, she may need these clothes to "keep up" with the image game. AND....they will be given to charity.
Just like that 30 minute ad was part of the game. Thank you for pointing it out. If someone donates to a campaign, they expect you to campaign. I think campaigning should be purely ran on donated funds. I really don't give a fuck who contributes. There are no ethics in politics anyway. HAHAHA!
-D-
-D-
I never disputed the legitimacy of the ad did I? Simply the validity of the clothing statement. I have no problem with campaign spending on things like this.
I know you didn't dispute it. I was referring to Classy.
-D-
-D-
Are they speaking of net worth or assets owned? I have assets worth over a half a million dollars but only made $15,000 last year. This can be a misleading figure.