My wife and I have been members of and leaders of various Kink and Lifestyle groups over the years and we would like to give this another shot. So here's the deal. First this will be a BBW/BHM group, that means all members need to identify as such. If you don't shop at Torrid/ Lane Bryant, then this is not the group for you. Second this will be a kink friendly and all gender/ orientation friendly. We're especially looking for couples with bi males; we feel that they are often excluded in LS groups. Third, we want to have parties to include orgy parties on the regular. As well as chatting regularly; we want to have active people. However, we will not throw people out if they aren't keeping up with the conversation. Lastly we are only seeking couples and single females at this time, we have some single males that we know and don't feel we need any more at this time. Also this should go without saying but no cheaters, if we find your doing this it is cause for immediate removal. PM for more info
I wonder, as a social experiment, if this post would be all fine and dandy if it were reversed and only an invite for super skinny women with no BBW allowed …. Hmmmm 🤔 … I suspect not.
Sugarjanejones wrote:
This is such an unnecessary hot take. Every time someone makes a post catering to traditionally marginalized or under-appreciated groups, it seems someone from a privileged group feels the need to comment something like this.
Comments like this aren’t just asking a question, they are creating a false equivalency in order to undermine the legitimacy of a marginalized group.
EVERY OTHER GROUP is for “super skinny women with no BBW allowed”. Do you really need to come and drag the ONE GROUP that isn’t designed to cater to the conventionally attractive?
Wow, it was just a question … and fyi sweetie I’m not a part of any other “group” , or “privileged” group, whatever the heck that is, but nice try at labeling me. From your answer it’s obvious you think its ok for one but not for the other. Sort of the different rules for thee and me world of today.
FunKinkyDuo wrote:
Double standard agin… you try to label me
again for simply posing a question … one you clearly don’t like being asked. And then by my offhandedly calling you sweetie is entirely different and has some deeper meaning that you think you’re somehow qualified to interpret and diagnose lol. You don’t know squat about me , so nice try at categorizing me !
My view is that perhaps the “group” should have just sent an invitation to everyone, you know, all inclusive, but just made it clear what their particular preference is. There is nothing wrong with having very specific sexual and physical preferences. We all have them.
But, thank you for sharing your position, behind a guise of inclusiveness, that you think one “group” is justified in being exclusionary while it’s not ok for others to be. Crystal Clear Felicia.
You don’t fit the description of this proposed group, nor are you interested in it based on your profile. Just here to stir up shit 😂. And why does the group need to send specific Invites instead of using a forum Intended for this exact purpose. It clearly will allow the group to reach a broader audience. Stepford wife mad she’s not invited to a party she doesn’t even wanna be at 😂
@Sugarjanejones Double standard agin… you try to label me
again for simply posing a question … one you clearly don’t like being asked. And then my offhandedly calling you sweetie is entirely different and has some deeper meaning that you think you’re somehow qualified to interpret and diagnose lol. You don’t know squat about me , so nice try at categorizing me !
My view is that perhaps the “group” should have just sent an invitation to everyone, you know, all inclusive, but just made it clear what their particular preference is. There is nothing wrong with having very specific sexual and physical preferences. We all have them.
But, thank you for sharing your position, behind a guise of inclusiveness, that you think one “group” is justified in being exclusionary while it’s not ok for others to be. Crystal Clear Felicia.
again for simply posing a question … one you clearly don’t like being asked. And then my offhandedly calling you sweetie is entirely different and has some deeper meaning that you think you’re somehow qualified to interpret and diagnose lol. You don’t know squat about me , so nice try at categorizing me !
My view is that perhaps the “group” should have just sent an invitation to everyone, you know, all inclusive, but just made it clear what their particular preference is. There is nothing wrong with having very specific sexual and physical preferences. We all have them.
But, thank you for sharing your position, behind a guise of inclusiveness, that you think one “group” is justified in being exclusionary while it’s not ok for others to be. Crystal Clear Felicia.
@Sugarjanejones I’ll end with this, and I’ll get out my box of crayons here to clarify for you. My entire point was to provoke thought ... everyone is entitled to their very specific preferences, but can you imagine the uproar that would have ensued if this post had had the specific requirements of big fake tits and women that MUST wear a size 2 or smaller lol ... oh the horror ! Get it ?
Well then that went sideways fast lol. I think that it is great that you are wanting to make this group I myself am not a BHM but my sexy wife is a BBW and that is what I like, I still like the fact you are doing this, and hope it works out well for you.
Definitely not what they were hoping for.
@ Sugarjanejones ... well good luck with your charge of being the Forum post police and attacking members with views that you assume to understand, that differ than yours. I never said I had any issues at all with this OPs post, and I don’t at all. I hope they meet new people that meet their preferences. I’m certain they’ve received interested party private messages.
You’re obviously incapable of recognizing your own self righteous know it all hypocrisy. And the fact that you’re deleting your own posts is actually hilarious.
You’re obviously incapable of recognizing your own self righteous know it all hypocrisy. And the fact that you’re deleting your own posts is actually hilarious.
Shit I did not know you could delete a post
JUSTBEGINING57 wrote:
Shit I did not know you could delete a post
Lol
Keyboard warriors do it all the time 🤣
Sugarjanejones wrote:FunKinkyDuo wrote:
@ Sugarjanejones ... well good luck with your charge of being the Forum post police and attacking members with views that you assume to understand, that differ than yours. I never said I had any issues at all with this OPs post, and I don’t at all. I hope they meet new people that meet their preferences. I’m certain they’ve received interested party private messages.
You’re obviously incapable of recognizing your own self righteous know it all hypocrisy. And the fact that you’re deleting your own posts is actually hilarious.
The fact you haven’t deleted your replies says more about you than anything you’ve written on this thread.
Yes it does !! .. because I have nothing to be ashamed of, even though you tried so hard to attack and interpret my initial post as something completely different than it was. But you can’t delete your posts that are quoted lol 😝 Nice start for being members for an entire week lol
I think the group is a good idea and I am reasonably certain there is enough room on the internet for at least one more group.
Bob
Bob
It's all well and good until you get to 50 members and then have to start turning people away, which is exactly why we don't use Kik for that.