So here’s a subject to contemplate for those that want to ... We ALL have our own personal “preferences” ... and since this is a swinger site I’m referring to those preferences that play into our sexual attraction (mental or physical or otherwise) ..., not the the kind of Xmas cookies you like best kind of preferences.
So my question is this ... if I or you like “THIS” sexually/attraction wise , but you do not like “THAT” ... is that discrimination against “THAT” ... or just a preference ?
🤔
So my question is this ... if I or you like “THIS” sexually/attraction wise , but you do not like “THAT” ... is that discrimination against “THAT” ... or just a preference ?
🤔
There is nothing wrong with discrimination when it comes to whom you choose to be sexual with. Our bodies are not public property. And if there is something you really don't like, I don't know how you could force yourself to get turned on.
SUNRISE wrote:
There is nothing wrong with discrimination when it comes to whom you choose to be sexual with. Our bodies are not public property. And if there is something you really don't like, I don't know how you could force yourself to get turned on.
Agreed ... like maybe a preference for big boobs or little boobs or the look of them ... that’s easy right? Is weight the same ?
And what about a non-physical attribute ... like say intelligence ?
You can’t help what turns you on or who you are attracted to. That is just preferences as you know what works and what doesn’t for you. Discrimination is prejudiced treatment of a person based on the group, class, or category to which the person is perceived to belong not individual likes.
You’re pretty much an asshole. In this day and age there is no room for a person to like what “they” like. You must like what you’re told.
You should never feel bad for not being attracted to someone. And for god’s sake you shouldn’t have sex with someone with whom you don’t want to.
Swinging is bit a good arena for guilt of any kind.
Cheers.
You should never feel bad for not being attracted to someone. And for god’s sake you shouldn’t have sex with someone with whom you don’t want to.
Swinging is bit a good arena for guilt of any kind.
Cheers.
Utahldscouple wrote:
You can’t help what turns you on or who you are attracted to. That is just preferences as you know what works and what doesn’t for you. Discrimination is prejudiced treatment of a person based on the group, class, or category to which the person is perceived to belong not individual likes.
Ok good point ... but ... since clearly sexual attraction is both physical and mental , what if what works or doesn’t work for someone sexually is intelligence ... or socioeconomic position ? These are not physical attributes but can’t they fairly be real factors in terms of sexual attraction ? And therefore a “preference” and not discrimination?
Discrimination can be against non-physical attributes as well (Political and religious are the two most obvious nowadays.) But I would call almost everything else a preference, at least as far as swinging is concerned.
One of the biggest hurdles we found when we first entered the lifestyle was people who were upset that, for whatever reason, we didn't want to fuck them. Their mindset was, "We're swingers and you're swingers so what's the problem? Let's fuck!" We did, eventually, come to the realization that in some instances our first impression, based on looks or whatever, could be overcome, in time, by getting to know people better and eventually finding a different kind of attractiveness that trumped simple physical attraction. YMMV
One of the biggest hurdles we found when we first entered the lifestyle was people who were upset that, for whatever reason, we didn't want to fuck them. Their mindset was, "We're swingers and you're swingers so what's the problem? Let's fuck!" We did, eventually, come to the realization that in some instances our first impression, based on looks or whatever, could be overcome, in time, by getting to know people better and eventually finding a different kind of attractiveness that trumped simple physical attraction. YMMV
All preference ...You like what you like.
EVILDOERS wrote:
Discrimination can be against non-physical attributes as well (Political and religious are the two most obvious nowadays.) But I would call almost everything else a preference, at least as far as swinging is concerned.
One of the biggest hurdles we found when we first entered the lifestyle was people who were upset that, for whatever reason, we didn't want to fuck them. Their mindset was, "We're swingers and you're swingers so what's the problem? Let's fuck!" We did, eventually, come to the realization that in some instances our first impression, based on looks or whatever, could be overcome, in time, by getting to know people better and eventually finding a different kind of attractiveness that trumped simple physical attraction. YMMV
Oh of course discrimination can be against non-physical ... my question was can a non-physical attribute be just a preference and not be discrimination .. it sounds like you think so ... other than maybe with political or religious?
Hmmm so let’s say someone keenly despises Trump, or Bernie (not that anyone does lol) .... like really can’t stand them. And someone crazy hot that LOVEs Trump, like wears a red MAGA hat loves, wants to hook up ... Could the political disposition “preference” still be only a preference, and not discrimination, if it gets in the way of any possible sexual attraction ?
DANDTCURIOUS wrote:
Hmmm so let’s say someone keenly despises Trump, or Bernie (not that anyone does lol) .... like really can’t stand them. And someone crazy hot that LOVEs Trump, like wears a red MAGA hat loves, wants to hook up ... Could the political disposition “preference” still be only a preference, and not discrimination, if it gets in the way of any possible sexual attraction ?
Just fuck them with the same passion that fuels your hatred for Trump! and leave politics out of the bedroom!
SheNMe wrote:
I measure this in terms of how I feel if another couple doesn’t reciprocate interest. Neither of us feel as if we have been discriminated against, we accept that we weren’t their type. No harm, no foul. Therein lies the beauty, we do not all share the same preferences.
Right ... but the question here is leading to ...
drum roll ... is there anything that can’t just be a preference?
Certainly sexual preference can be a preference right ? That’s why its called a preference lol ... No one is calling out a gay person for discriminating against not having sex with straight people right ?
What about race ? ... fair sexual preference ?
Oh lord! And the Saga continues..... LOL
It's not discrimination until it leaves out the person that is offended that they were not selected... Seen it on this site so many times, they think they are part of a certain preference group but then get offended because a certain trait doesn't meet the standard(age, weight, looks), then it becomes a discrimination/stuck up/this site sucks thing.
Fuck who you want, not those that think they should be.
Fuck who you want, not those that think they should be.
I don’t think access to someone’s body is a “civil right” and therefore not subject to anti-discriminations laws. If you deem a person’s body public property or even private property, open for public access, it would be subject to public access laws that prohibit discrimination, but we, as people own ourselves and are not under public domain. So laws the guarantee non-discriminatory public access do not apply.
Ucouple wrote:
You’re pretty much an asshole. In this day and age there is no room for a person to like what “they” like. You must like what you’re told.
You should never feel bad for not being attracted to someone. And for god’s sake you shouldn’t have sex with someone with whom you don’t want to.
Swinging is bit a good arena for guilt of any kind.
Cheers.
EXACTLY! I am all for being inclusive as a society, but when it comes to getting buck wild and having sex, it just is what it is. The PC police don't need to be in the bedroom too (As sexy as it sounds to have a critique from some SJWs as to not only our inclusivity, but maybe some of our form, style, original moves, costume, etc 🤣).
DANDTCURIOUS wrote:EVILDOERS wrote:
Discrimination can be against non-physical attributes as well (Political and religious are the two most obvious nowadays.) But I would call almost everything else a preference, at least as far as swinging is concerned.
One of the biggest hurdles we found when we first entered the lifestyle was people who were upset that, for whatever reason, we didn't want to fuck them. Their mindset was, "We're swingers and you're swingers so what's the problem? Let's fuck!" We did, eventually, come to the realization that in some instances our first impression, based on looks or whatever, could be overcome, in time, by getting to know people better and eventually finding a different kind of attractiveness that trumped simple physical attraction. YMMV
Oh of course discrimination can be against non-physical ... my question was can a non-physical attribute be just a preference and not be discrimination .. it sounds like you think so ... other than maybe with political or religious?
Hmmm so let’s say someone keenly despises Trump, or Bernie (not that anyone does lol) .... like really can’t stand them. And someone crazy hot that LOVEs Trump, like wears a red MAGA hat loves, wants to hook up ... Could the political disposition “preference” still be only a preference, and not discrimination, if it gets in the way of any possible sexual attraction ?
Holy shit! You mean it messes me up when I wear my MAGA hat in sexual situations (Though I prefer a more discriminatory MAGA hat "Make Adam God Again" The Mormon Vatican peeps will understand that one)? I thought everyone got turned on by Trump. Ask him... He will tell you. He is the best at ______. 🤣 i freaking loved your example by the way, hilarious and good point. Great example, totally got the visual! 🤣🤣🤣
Perma-Bachelor wrote:
Just fuck them with the same passion that fuels your hatred for Trump! and leave politics out of the bedroom!
LOL I equally despise Trump and Bernie, and Warren, and AOC and and and ... I just picked Trumpy for the analogy
I get a lot of discrimination based on my skin color in the lifestyle but aside from that I’m bias cause I primarily like white/Latin couples
Might as well throw this out here..
Being black in the lifestyle is a HUGE plus factor.. atleast from personal experience.
All this talk about discrimination and this and that.. is gonna make some members start looking like bigots.... so leave it alone. Lol
Being black in the lifestyle is a HUGE plus factor.. atleast from personal experience.
All this talk about discrimination and this and that.. is gonna make some members start looking like bigots.... so leave it alone. Lol
DANDTCURIOUS wrote:
LOL I equally despise Trump and Bernie, and Warren, and AOC and and and ... I just picked Trumpy for the analogy
You picked an excellent example. I hear you about the other politicians on the other side of the wing. I am a left of center type, probably actually more Libertarian leaning. The divide between the 2 party system is pretty insane these days, but Trumpty Dumpty example is money! 🙂
Your also a guy soo..
massageBBCguy wrote:
Might as well throw this out here..
Being black in the lifestyle is a HUGE plus factor.. atleast from personal experience.
All this talk about discrimination and this and that.. is gonna make some members start looking like bigots.... so leave it alone. Lol
Well therein lies the reason I started this thread ... you see today some hypocritical judgmental b***ch sent us a message telling me that because my profile says my sexual preference for men that join with us is for white men, that I’m not actually picky like my profile says, but that I’m something else. She was clearly insinuating that I’m racist because of my sexual preference in that regard. I told her she needs to look up the definition for starters, and that IMO shes quite the hypocrite considering she has sexual preferences requiring that the men she plays with are attractive, intelligent and classy, oh and that she says she’s not interested in men in their 20s, because they aren’t actually MEN yet lol.
Anyway, we think purely sexual preferences are quite different than attributes that are otherwise rightfully considered discriminatory in other situations.
Thanks for everyone willing to put their opinion out there ... ya gotta admit it’s a more thought provoking forum topic than “why aren’t there more unicorns 🦄 on the site” lol 🙂
I know who you are talking about and I disagree she is definitely NOT A B***CH.
Anywaysssssssss let’s let it go..
Anywaysssssssss let’s let it go..
It really doesn't matter whether it's discrimination or not. Everyone gets to choose what they will accept sexually, for any reason or no reason. Discrimination is only an issue in matters where society agrees their should be equal access. So, yeah, for things like access to education, affordable housing, healthcare, legal representation, etc., discrimination is a big deal. But there is no presumption of equal access to a person's body. Regardless of what the person's underlying motivations are, wheter it's a preference or a deep-seated bigotry, they still get to determine who has access to their body. And anybody who tries to browbeat them into submission is really just attempting rape.
That's too bad cause your skin color is gorgeous 😍
I don't know much about it but if you are not interested in someone you can't make yourself be interested in this person sometimes I like she doesn't or the other way around but you can always be friends with them
This is great!
Ucouple wrote:Needs more lube oops we mean butter!
This is great!
Didn't realize this thread was apparently about skin tone. Fun fact. Skin is technically ALL the same color. It varies only by value, which is the relative lightness or darkness of a particular color. Saturation and chroma also play a role in how we perceive colors. Maybe a more accurate way to state your preference would be to say that you prefer that your lovers have a much higher skin tone value...of course, then you might be inundated by requests to fuck by albino swingers. But, based on the verbiage in your profile, albinos WOULD be the closest color value to your stated preference of "white".
One can discriminate between what they like and dont like.
If lets say your discrimination is based on bias, bigotry or prejudice then you probably have no business being in the lifestyle. Variety and experiencing different things for us is what the lifestyle is all about. Preference is what you would prefer to have, like maybe a different sexual position might be your preference.
You probably know which one you are and if that works for you and you are having fun in the lifestyle with it then why not. At the point you discriminate based on bigotry or prejudice you probably will not be having all the fun you should have or could have.
If lets say your discrimination is based on bias, bigotry or prejudice then you probably have no business being in the lifestyle. Variety and experiencing different things for us is what the lifestyle is all about. Preference is what you would prefer to have, like maybe a different sexual position might be your preference.
You probably know which one you are and if that works for you and you are having fun in the lifestyle with it then why not. At the point you discriminate based on bigotry or prejudice you probably will not be having all the fun you should have or could have.
@DANDTCURIOUS
We are all judged on this site in one form or another. I looked at your pics judged you are pretty hot. I'm sure plenty of people think the same. I also thought your parameters for those you are interested in is pretty narrow but you do mention you are "picky". I dont have any problem with that but I also know you guys are not our type.
Oh yea a preference where I can discriminate between what I like and dont like just as you do...and never be upset that I am being judged.
We are all judged on this site in one form or another. I looked at your pics judged you are pretty hot. I'm sure plenty of people think the same. I also thought your parameters for those you are interested in is pretty narrow but you do mention you are "picky". I dont have any problem with that but I also know you guys are not our type.
Oh yea a preference where I can discriminate between what I like and dont like just as you do...and never be upset that I am being judged.
So.. naturally I am not sexually attracted to Black females (with both parents black).. I will go ahead and cancel out any attempt to use my comment as a social proof
The sole reason is.. I have black sisters and to my it’s just kinda weird to be with my own kind.
Hmmm it’s probably a mental disorder but I don’t need help, I like me this way.
Look.. one can say “oh he does not like black girls” that’s probably true.. but I don’t have to be an asshole about my preference.. and I think that’s what started this forum..
I don’t think the PM (from a white female to you) was saying open your preference it was more like don’t be an asshole about your preference.. LOl.
The “asshole” is an adjective..
The sole reason is.. I have black sisters and to my it’s just kinda weird to be with my own kind.
Hmmm it’s probably a mental disorder but I don’t need help, I like me this way.
Look.. one can say “oh he does not like black girls” that’s probably true.. but I don’t have to be an asshole about my preference.. and I think that’s what started this forum..
I don’t think the PM (from a white female to you) was saying open your preference it was more like don’t be an asshole about your preference.. LOl.
The “asshole” is an adjective..
EVILDOERS wrote:
Didn't realize this thread was apparently about skin tone. Fun fact. Skin is technically ALL the same color. It varies only by value, which is the relative lightness or darkness of a particular color. Saturation and chroma also play a role in how we perceive colors. Maybe a more accurate way to state your preference would be to say that you prefer that your lovers have a much higher skin tone value...of course, then you might be inundated by requests to fuck by albino swingers. But, based on the verbiage in your profile, albinos WOULD be the closest color value to your stated preference of "white".
Exactly, OmG you figured out my albino fetish ... crazy right ? 😂 👻
massageBBCguy wrote:
So.. naturally I am not sexually attracted to Black females (with both parents black).. I will go ahead and cancel out any attempt to use my comment as a social proof
The sole reason is.. I have black sisters and to my it’s just kinda weird to be with my own kind.
Hmmm it’s probably a mental disorder but I don’t need help, I like me this way.
Look.. one can say “oh he does not like black girls” that’s probably true.. but I don’t have to be an asshole about my preference.. and I think that’s what started this forum..
I don’t think the PM (from a white female to you) was saying open your preference it was more like don’t be an asshole about your preference.. LOl.
The “asshole” is an adjective..
Well let’s see ... first off Ummmmm NO! ... she misquoted what my profile says in her first message to me and said... “you’re not picky, you’re something else”. I would copy and paste it but I deleted the hypocrites message. Too bad she doesn’t have the balls to chime in here 🙄 . And then in a follow up message she referenced the KKK. So NO she wasn’t saying “don’t be an asshole about my sexual preferences”, she was saying she thinks I’m “something else” .... which then lead to my starting this thread wohoo 🥳
And why the F are you defending her ? You are quite clearly as much of a racist as I am according to her judgmental hypocritical opinions lol. We both have our sexual preferences .. and I’m sure you’re ALSO not a racist, and I suspect you would ALSO not appreciate being accused of being one 🤷🏼♂️
Discrimination in this state is of the chart when it comes to swinging, its more like being back in high school trying to crawl your way up between popularity and looks, lots of people are very prejudiced, and here is where we see the difference between discrimination, prejudice, ETC and true honest preference. Attraction may come in different ways, color, and sizes, and how are you going to decide if its a yes or a no if you don't even give yourself the chance to get to know other people, you may base your judgement base only in looks and find later the other party is/are crazy drama people and jerks, or maybe you hang out at a party or over drinks with a couple you didn't feel much attraction at first but as the night develops they turn to be great and the mental connection was greater than the physical one.
we have seen how people don't even say hi to others because of age, race, social class, ETC; In occasions We have even been told to stay away from other couples for these very same reasons, if you are a party and can say hi to everyone and/or hangout with anyone to at least become friends or acquaintance, and you just walk around looking down on people and just talking to a selected few, that you think are worthy of you exchanging eye contact and few words... well YES you are discriminating and a prejudiced person, do we think that is right? Hell NO, but again its your decision...
Accepting everyone and respecting them for what and who they are doesn't mean you have to sleep with them but it says few more things about you...
we have seen how people don't even say hi to others because of age, race, social class, ETC; In occasions We have even been told to stay away from other couples for these very same reasons, if you are a party and can say hi to everyone and/or hangout with anyone to at least become friends or acquaintance, and you just walk around looking down on people and just talking to a selected few, that you think are worthy of you exchanging eye contact and few words... well YES you are discriminating and a prejudiced person, do we think that is right? Hell NO, but again its your decision...
Accepting everyone and respecting them for what and who they are doesn't mean you have to sleep with them but it says few more things about you...
Its funny how many people here, acts like racist, talks like racist, walk like racist... and when they are called out they get offended, you may call it a preference, and it may even be a preference but its racist, just own it, don't try to paint it a different tone to make it sound almost not racist, Just own it and the good part is, you are entitle to be.
Here is what she said
“Yes. The KKK is also protected by free speech laws. I’m not saying you can’t say those things, only that you might not be aware of how it is coming across. It’s not great.”
True or false?
And I am defending her because she is super cool.. LOL.
“Yes. The KKK is also protected by free speech laws. I’m not saying you can’t say those things, only that you might not be aware of how it is coming across. It’s not great.”
True or false?
And I am defending her because she is super cool.. LOL.
DANDTCURIOUS wrote:
[quote=massageBBCguy]Here is what she said
“Yes. The KKK is also protected by free speech laws. I’m not saying you can’t say those things, only that you might not be aware of how it is coming across. It’s not great.”
True or false?
And I am defending her because she is super cool.. LOL.
Well that’s not the first message ... but Ok whatever you say, she’s super cool ... but be careful, she should actually think you’re a racist too ... and if she doesn’t she’s a hypocrite ... oh wait, we already covered that one 😉
This discussion has been interesting to say the least ... I appreciate your open opinions .. let’s go do some tequila shots sometime 😘[/
Are Latin woman ok?
Not sure that the choice between discrimination and preference is the most useful language for this context. Consider instead, more nerdy operations terms, which have useful connotations here: "qualifiers" and "order winners"
A qualifier is a feature that one can think of as a necessity. For example, for many people height-weight proportionate is a qualifier. That's one I just can't get beyond. An order winner is a characteristic in which tradeoffs are considered. I like tight abs, and also like nice legs. The absence of either one is not a deal-breaker, but having both would lead me to the partner that has those characteristics.
A qualifier is a feature that one can think of as a necessity. For example, for many people height-weight proportionate is a qualifier. That's one I just can't get beyond. An order winner is a characteristic in which tradeoffs are considered. I like tight abs, and also like nice legs. The absence of either one is not a deal-breaker, but having both would lead me to the partner that has those characteristics.
massageBBCguy wrote:
Here is what she said
“Yes. The KKK is also protected by free speech laws. I’m not saying you can’t say those things, only that you might not be aware of how it is coming across. It’s not great.”
True or false?
And I am defending her because she is super cool.. LOL.
Well that’s not her first “not picky” message to me, but whatever, this he said she’s said is getting silly ... This discussion has been interesting to say the least ... I appreciate your open opinions .. let’s all go do some tequila shots sometime 😝
It is OK to discriminate, hate and be prejudiced about whatever or whomever you want at a personal level (ie that little universe between your ears). Just know that you share the same country, town and other spaces and webspaces with other individuals as tolerated by the law. For example, a mangy horse may not be allowed at a SLC mall, but a properly behaved, dressed and groomed grown-ass human, regardless of his/her criminal or ethnic background is allowed. So, make sure you don't incur into a hate crime or anything illegal. Still, it is your choice to be prejudiced and to advocate pro or against anything you give or not give a shit as long as you keep it legal.
It is very probable that there are single males with dismaying criminal backgrounds on this website looking at your profile and posing as "respectful and normal" individuals. Please keep in mind that criminals are masters of deceit, liars and are good at pretending to be something they are not in order to earn your trust and continue their crime sprees.
It is very probable that there are single males with dismaying criminal backgrounds on this website looking at your profile and posing as "respectful and normal" individuals. Please keep in mind that criminals are masters of deceit, liars and are good at pretending to be something they are not in order to earn your trust and continue their crime sprees.
TheAdventurousCouple wrote:
Not sure that the choice between discrimination and preference is the most useful language for this context. Consider instead, more nerdy operations terms, which have useful connotations here: "qualifiers" and "order winners"
A qualifier is a feature that one can think of as a necessity. For example, for many people height-weight proportionate is a qualifier. That's one I just can't get beyond. An order winner is a characteristic in which tradeoffs are considered. I like tight abs, and also like nice legs. The absence of either one is not a deal-breaker, but having both would lead me to the partner that has those characteristics.
Perfect! I like those terms ... so getting this back on track lol
... it seems most people that commented, but not all, concur that nearly any attribute that a person may have, whether it be physical or non-physical, can be a legitimate "qualifier" or "order winner", when it comes to attributes that influence sexual attraction needs ... and it can be simply just that, without it being something that is hateful and more deeply rooted, which we all know unfortunately also exists in some people.
It sounded like for some, some attributes that have nothing to do with physical appearance just don't qualify. I’m actually surprised that the non-physical attributes like politics, religion, intelligence, socioeconomic position etc weren’t the most debated ... maybe too sensitive 🤷🏼♂️
(i.e the red hat analogy .... and btw I could totally get over the red MAGA hat lol).
Question, if a person states in a profile looking for bbc wouldn't that be the same racial profile as what is stated. Why is that acceptable? Shouldn't anyone looking for bbc be sent a message and called out? It's on so many profiles as a desire, yet it just gets passed on as sexual preference not discrimination. But here has to be made because someone posts "white as a preference" and all of a sudden they are racist. When you read a profile that doesn't suit your interest or you take offense, just move on. Worry about yourself. Only time I see a need for this is when it's a lawful matter that needs to be addressed by admins or law enforcement if need be.
LOL. That’s a good one...
I’m going to try as sum this up....
I’m white, and there are white women that I still wouldn’t put my wiener in.
....there.
I also want to say the OP has great breasts. Well done OP, we’ll done.
B
I’m white, and there are white women that I still wouldn’t put my wiener in.
....there.
I also want to say the OP has great breasts. Well done OP, we’ll done.
B
DANDTCURIOUS wrote:. It’s a good one as-in that makes sense. Lol..massageBBCguy wrote:
LOL. That’s a good one...
Hmm ... I’m curious ... like it’s a valid point “good one”? ... or a funny haha dismissing it “good one” ?
Ucouple wrote:
I’m going to try as sum this up....
I’m white, and there are white women that I still wouldn’t put my wiener in.
....there.
I also want to say the OP has great breasts. Well done OP, we’ll done.
B
LOL Well thank you! ... they cost an arm and a leg hehe 😉
DANDTCURIOUS wrote:Ucouple wrote:
I’m going to try as sum this up....
I’m white, and there are white women that I still wouldn’t put my wiener in.
....there.
I also want to say the OP has great breasts. Well done OP, we’ll done.
B
LOL Well thank you! ... they cost an arm and a leg hehe 😉
I will gladly let you borrow one of my legs in exchange for some time with them.
What if you have a preference for discriminating tastes?
Why would anyone but a racist, want to have sex with a real racist? Racism is stupid, considering there is no such thing as race. Race is a human construct. Some of us look different due to adaptations our ancestors went through to different climates and geographies. So, if what we call race is only skin deep, it’s just appearance. Most of us have a preference for certain physical characteristics. So long as your preference is free of any of the ridiculous, thinking and the accompanying rhetoric that is associated with racism, it’s probably just a preference.
As for us, we celebrate diversity! The two of us find a lot of people from all sorts of ancestry and appearance sexy. Bring it on!
As for us, we celebrate diversity! The two of us find a lot of people from all sorts of ancestry and appearance sexy. Bring it on!
SexyPowSkiers wrote:
What if you have a preference for discriminating tastes?
Haha ... I see what you did there lol
I think having a preference for only those with discriminating tastes is a perfectly legitimate swinger preference 😉
DELICIOUSLYWET wrote:
Why would anyone but a racist, want to have sex with a real racist? Racism is stupid, considering there is no such thing as race. Race is a human construct. Some of us look different due to adaptations our ancestors went through to different climates and geographies. So, if what we call race is only skin deep, it’s just appearance. Most of us have a preference for certain physical characteristics. So long as your preference is free of any of the ridiculous, thinking and the accompanying rhetoric that is associated with racism, it’s probably just a preference.
As for us, we celebrate diversity! The two of us find a lot of people from all sorts of ancestry and appearance sexy. Bring it on!
Exactly , thank you !! .. unfortunately the hypocrite woman who accused me of being a racist (who btw is white... funny how some just assumed she is black) ... doesn’t get that. But I’ve already beat that dead horse to multiple deaths lol
LMAO.. yeah she is white.. and SUPER HOT!!!!
Desryan wrote:
I don't know how a persons preference in any shap or form could come across as racist or discrimination. People are attracted to what they like and the color of someone's skin should not matter. But some people just don't like the interracial thing, that should not make them a racist tho.
If you don’t like someone or a couple for the fact that they are mixed or one is white and one is black it would make you look like a racist
Omg.. seriously?
Ok. I am really getting tired of all this.. if you don’t then you are a racist.
Ok swingers and single.. let’s push Congress to re-amend the 1964 Civil rights act to create a new cause of action “Failure to fuck a minority” and create a federal regulation requiring members to post “I am an Equal Opportunity Swinger”..
I hope this helps. Ugh...
Ok. I am really getting tired of all this.. if you don’t then you are a racist.
Ok swingers and single.. let’s push Congress to re-amend the 1964 Civil rights act to create a new cause of action “Failure to fuck a minority” and create a federal regulation requiring members to post “I am an Equal Opportunity Swinger”..
I hope this helps. Ugh...
massageBBCguy wrote:
Omg.. seriously?
Ok. I am really getting tired of all this.. if you don’t then you are a racist.
Ok swingers and single.. let’s push Congress to re-amend the 1964 Civil rights act to create a new cause of action “Failure to fuck a minority” and create a federal regulation requiring members to post “I am an Equal Opportunity Swinger”..
I hope this helps. Ugh...
I’m not saying because they are not getting fucked I get plenty fucked. I think you mis understood me.
By definition racism has nothing to do with a persons sexual preferences or qualifiers of who they have sexual interaction with. That’s not to say that it couldn’t be a racist issue with a racist ... but certainly it’s not racist to prefer a particular ethnicity. Perhaps thats why it’s one of the sections of the profiles here.
Maybe we should just move on to AGE now ... oooor BIG fake tits wohoo 🥳
Age seems to me to be one of the few, or only, attribute that can be both a physical or non-physical attribute, that plays into a persons preference. ... in either direction. Hmmm 🤔
Age seems to me to be one of the few, or only, attribute that can be both a physical or non-physical attribute, that plays into a persons preference. ... in either direction. Hmmm 🤔
Y’all are way too picky!
I have one criterion that decides if I’ll have sex with someone. They can be black, white, yellow, male, female, old or a Trump supporter; as long as their ass can fit between the armrests of a jazzy we’re good.
How would you label me, vanessababy?
Does anyone else find it funny that people will ascribe labels and prejudices to people they deem racist in order to combat racism, prejudices and labels. Aren’t we humans funny?
I have one criterion that decides if I’ll have sex with someone. They can be black, white, yellow, male, female, old or a Trump supporter; as long as their ass can fit between the armrests of a jazzy we’re good.
How would you label me, vanessababy?
Does anyone else find it funny that people will ascribe labels and prejudices to people they deem racist in order to combat racism, prejudices and labels. Aren’t we humans funny?
Ucouple wrote:
Y’all are way too picky!
I have one criterion that decides if I’ll have sex with someone. They can be black, white, yellow, male, female, old or a Trump supporter; as long as their ass can fit between the armrests of a jazzy we’re good.
How would you label me, vanessababy?
Does anyone else find it funny that people will ascribe labels and prejudices to people they deem racist in order to combat racism, prejudices and labels. Aren’t we humans funny?
I wouldn’t label you. You guys have been super chill
VANESSA_BABY wrote:Cause of Action is the reason for a lawsuit.. well here ——-A cause of action, in law, is a set of facts sufficient to justify a right to sue to obtain money, property, or the enforcement of a right against another part—— “Failure to fuck” doesn’t really mean you are not getting plenty of sex.. it means for example.. “Failure to hire” against a white employer.. a “failure to fuck” against white swinger. I hope that helps.massageBBCguy wrote:
Omg.. seriously?
Ok. I am really getting tired of all this.. if you don’t then you are a racist.
Ok swingers and single.. let’s push Congress to re-amend the 1964 Civil rights act to create a new cause of action “Failure to fuck a minority” and create a federal regulation requiring members to post “I am an Equal Opportunity Swinger”..
I hope this helps. Ugh...
I’m not saying because they are not getting fucked I get plenty fucked. I think you mis understood me.
Can't begin to tell you how sick and tired of this fucktard PC culture we are!! If "Green" isn't your thing and you don't want to fuck a Martian, don't. It doesn't ,mean you're a racist or a Martianoginist….it just means greens not your thing....no more no less.
We’re uber-liberal, and do not connect with conservatives. Connection is what does it for us as casual sex isn’t our thing.
Not discriminating, but if we know we can’t connect, we won’t force it. Really, why? There is an adequate number of people that share our views. At a minimum, the dinners are far more enjoyable.
Not discriminating, but if we know we can’t connect, we won’t force it. Really, why? There is an adequate number of people that share our views. At a minimum, the dinners are far more enjoyable.
massageBBCguy wrote:Cause of Action is the reason for a lawsuit.. well here ——-A cause of action, in law, is a set of facts sufficient to justify a right to sue to obtain money, property, or the enforcement of a right against another part—— “Failure to fuck” doesn’t really mean you are not getting plenty of sex.. it means for example.. “Failure to hire” against a white employer.. a “failure to fuck” against white swinger. I hope that helps.[/quote]VANESSA_BABY wrote:
[quote=massageBBCguy]Omg.. seriously?
Ok. I am really getting tired of all this.. if you don’t then you are a racist.
Ok swingers and single.. let’s push Congress to re-amend the 1964 Civil rights act to create a new cause of action “Failure to fuck a minority” and create a federal regulation requiring members to post “I am an Equal Opportunity Swinger”..
I hope this helps. Ugh...
I’m not saying because they are not getting fucked I get plenty fucked. I think you mis understood me.
It’s funny cause you have hit me up a couple of times
VANESSA_BABY wrote:Cause of Action is the reason for a lawsuit.. well here ——-A cause of action, in law, is a set of facts sufficient to justify a right to sue to obtain money, property, or the enforcement of a right against another part—— “Failure to fuck” doesn’t really mean you are not getting plenty of sex.. it means for example.. “Failure to hire” against a white employer.. a “failure to fuck” against white swinger. I hope that helps.[/quote]VANESSA_BABY wrote:
[quote=massageBBCguy][quote=VANESSA_BABY][quote=massageBBCguy]Omg.. seriously?
Ok. I am really getting tired of all this.. if you don’t then you are a racist.
Ok swingers and single.. let’s push Congress to re-amend the 1964 Civil rights act to create a new cause of action “Failure to fuck a minority” and create a federal regulation requiring members to post “I am an Equal Opportunity Swinger”..
I hope this helps. Ugh...
I’m not saying because they are not getting fucked I get plenty fucked. I think you mis understood me.
It’s funny cause you have hit me up a couple of times[/quote][/quote]
Oh probably did but I honestly don’t remember.. and I am sure it was more than 1 year ago when I was a ROOKIE... LMAO.. since you want to go this route... I wouldn’t do it for $10k.
Yeah. It was more than a year ago... anything else you want to add?
And here I thought for sure the discussion would switch to debating Big Fake stripper tits as a preference LOL 🤷🏼♀️
DANDTCURIOUS wrote:
And here I thought for sure the discussion would switch to debating Big Fake stripper tits as a preference LOL 🤷🏼♀️
I prefer natural big tits
Desryan wrote:
If you spend enough fake ones can look pretty real.
Who wants tits that look real ? LOL 😝
I guess I was blessed cause I have been 36DD since high school