Why no pubes? Pubes are people too (SCOTUS 4-5 Gillette vs. Harry Bush). It's rather sad that many here haven't quite reached puberty. Makes me feel a little bit perverted looking at completely bare genitals all the time. Don't know whether to ask people if they want to meet for a drink or for ice cream. 
And you never feel kinda like a pedophile when you're chowing down on a hairless cooch?
IndecentDuo wrote:
Actually, the act of removing a females pubic hair dates well into the 3-4th century bc in certain cultures and is looked on as another facet of hygiene in others.
True. But to be fair they did it because they had crabs.
IndecentDuo wrote:EVILDOERS wrote:
[quote=IndecentDuo]Actually, the act of removing a females pubic hair dates well into the 3-4th century bc in certain cultures and is looked on as another facet of hygiene in others.
True. But to be fair they did it because they had crabs.
In Victorian days that was the common rationale in Europe for about 300 years, but it was common before then in Europe and it was practiced well before that by middle eastern, African and Asian countries. [/quote]
So you're saying that THEY didn't have crabs too? Who knew there was such a rich, detailed history of the advent of pediculosis pubis.
