Something that has bothered me a little bit...when we went to Lumpys the doorman asked if we were there for the Sinful event. We says yes and as we were walking down the stairs some people upstairs asked him what was going on and he said it was a swingers party. I mentioned it to a few people that night and it seemed that it was a normal occurrence. We realize that going to the events we may run into someone we know, however, people who don't know about our lifestyle also go to lumpys. I would hate for them to know there was a swingers party going on and then see us leaving or something. My question..is this normal? Is it this way at, say, Sandy Station? Do the group organizers ask for confidentiality?
Good question. We feel the same way. I'm not interested in going to an event somewhere if the organizers haven't instructed the bouncers and staff to exhibit utmost discretion.
While we're talking confidentiality, I read an article about our future president's plan to increase domestic spying once again. He's also called for a boycott of Apple because they won't allow the government to have a backdoor into their phones. Texts to Android phones, however, are vulnerable, even when they originate from an iPhone. Phone data is also at risk.
The article mentioned that apps like Signal and What's App are the only ones that are government hack-proof, but the person you are texting must have the same app.
Another question I have to ask is: How safe is the Swingular phone app? I'm hesitant to use it on my phone after the inauguration.
The article mentioned that apps like Signal and What's App are the only ones that are government hack-proof, but the person you are texting must have the same app.
Another question I have to ask is: How safe is the Swingular phone app? I'm hesitant to use it on my phone after the inauguration.
PROVOCATIVE wrote:
While we're talking confidentiality, I read an article about our future president's plan to increase domestic spying once again. He's also called for a boycott of Apple because they won't allow the government to have a backdoor into their phones. Texts to Android phones, however, are vulnerable, even when they originate from an iPhone. Phone data is also at risk.
The article mentioned that apps like Signal and What's App are the only ones that are government hack-proof, but the person you are texting must have the same app.
Another question I have to ask is: How safe is the Swingular phone app? I'm hesitant to use it on my phone after the inauguration.
The NSA probably already knows you're swingers. And if they don't, Google almost for SURE does! lol
And as far as increased domestic surveillance after the inauguration, I think you only really need to worry if you're, like, a Muslim...or a minority...or a liberal...or a woman.
Provacative.... Have you heard a recording of him saying this? Because there is so much mis information floating around out there in the ether......Just saying...
PROVOCATIVE wrote:
While we're talking confidentiality, I read an article about our future president's plan to increase domestic spying once again. He's also called for a boycott of Apple because they won't allow the government to have a backdoor into their phones. Texts to Android phones, however, are vulnerable, even when they originate from an iPhone. Phone data is also at risk.
The article mentioned that apps like Signal and What's App are the only ones that are government hack-proof, but the person you are texting must have the same app.
Another question I have to ask is: How safe is the Swingular phone app? I'm hesitant to use it on my phone after the inauguration.
Your phones will be as safe after the inauguration as they were before. Since 911, the government (NSA/CIA/FBI/ATF) has been going full steam no matter what you read in some article or see on the news. Unless your convo's or texts pertain to terrorism, drug smuggling, militia activity,money laundering, heists/robberies, or gun smuggling they pass on by your communications. The federal government isn't looking for what you do between the sheets anyway. There are 325 million people in the US to try to monitor. They don't waste their time and resources on the average person.
The biggest fear out there for us is hackers, as far as miss using personal information, and that won't be effected in the slightest by who is in office. The internet/communications criminals are what we should be worried about.
Actually, I'm more worried about silly things like breathable air and potable water and whether or not my daughter or granddaughter will have control over their own bodies or could possibly be forced to carry a rapist's child because, you know,...Jesus. It's pretty clear that Pence, one of the most hard-core fundamentalist Xian politicians (Google some of the crazy-ass shit he's done in Indiana) will be doing a lot of the day to day stuff normally reserved for the POTUS and influencing policy perhaps more than any VP in history. I wonder if he'll eventually target swinging or if we'll be able to fly under the radar. I dare one of you Trump supporters to email Pence and ask him his stance on swinging.
EVILDOERS wrote:
The NSA probably already knows you're swingers. And if they don't, Google almost for SURE does! lol
And as far as increased domestic surveillance after the inauguration, I think you only really need to worry if you're, like, a Muslim...or a minority...or a liberal...or a woman.
NSA stopped listening to my calls once Obama became president. I guess they didn't hear anything worth taping. And considering that I'm a new Swinger, it's entirely possible that no one has the goods on me just yet.
On the other hand, there's this: Bow Down to President Trump
And great shall be the rewards tonight! 
Someone is always watching...and there is not much we can do about that
We just had 4 n s a guys and 3 eff bee eye guys show up at our house ask if they were early to the gangbang. What the hell Mr. President?
100% agreed!
BUBULAPLEASE wrote:
Something that has bothered me a little bit...when we went to Lumpys the doorman asked if we were there for the Sinful event. We says yes and as we were walking down the stairs some people upstairs asked him what was going on and he said it was a swingers party. I mentioned it to a few people that night and it seemed that it was a normal occurrence. We realize that going to the events we may run into someone we know, however, people who don't know about our lifestyle also go to lumpys. I would hate for them to know there was a swingers party going on and then see us leaving or something. My question..is this normal? Is it this way at, say, Sandy Station? Do the group organizers ask for confidentiality?
Unfortunately its naive to think a doorman would actually be told how to respond or give it much thought otherwise. Its unlikely they care unless they know it would jeopardize the business these events bring in. We realize the risk of being found out but we also realize that deniability is just using the right words should you ever fall into the circumstance of being asked if you where there for the swinger event at Lumpys.
So our response for someone vanilla that we know would be OMG can you believe we wondered into to that event...wow what a funny mistake(as we laugh both inside and out). Many people would prefer to not put themselves in the situation but its always best just to have a game plan on how to react for judgmental vanillas.
Didn't Lumpy's close it's doors?